HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem sbel2x 1345
Description: Elimination of double substitution.
Assertion
Ref Expression
sbel2x |- (ph <-> E.xE.y((x = z /\ y = w) /\ [y / w][x / z]ph))
Distinct variable groups:   x,y,z   y,w   ph,x,y

Proof of Theorem sbel2x
StepHypRef Expression
1 sbelx 1344 . . . . 5 |- ([x / z]ph <-> E.y(y = w /\ [y / w][x / z]ph))
21anbi2i 480 . . . 4 |- ((x = z /\ [x / z]ph) <-> (x = z /\ E.y(y = w /\ [y / w][x / z]ph)))
32exbii 1051 . . 3 |- (E.x(x = z /\ [x / z]ph) <-> E.x(x = z /\ E.y(y = w /\ [y / w][x / z]ph)))
4 sbelx 1344 . . 3 |- (ph <-> E.x(x = z /\ [x / z]ph))
5 exdistr 1309 . . 3 |- (E.xE.y(x = z /\ (y = w /\ [y / w][x / z]ph)) <-> E.x(x = z /\ E.y(y = w /\ [y / w][x / z]ph)))
63, 4, 53bitr4 183 . 2 |- (ph <-> E.xE.y(x = z /\ (y = w /\ [y / w][x / z]ph)))
7 anass 439 . . 3 |- (((x = z /\ y = w) /\ [y / w][x / z]ph) <-> (x = z /\ (y = w /\ [y / w][x / z]ph)))
872exbii 1052 . 2 |- (E.xE.y((x = z /\ y = w) /\ [y / w][x / z]ph) <-> E.xE.y(x = z /\ (y = w /\ [y / w][x / z]ph)))
96, 8bitr4 176 1 |- (ph <-> E.xE.y((x = z /\ y = w) /\ [y / w][x / z]ph))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   <-> wb 146   /\ wa 223   = wceq 956  E.wex 980  [wsbc 1170
This theorem is referenced by:  opabid 2810
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 962  ax-gen 963  ax-8 964  ax-10 966  ax-12 968  ax-17 971  ax-4 973  ax-5o 975  ax-6o 978  ax-9o 1123  ax-10o 1140  ax-16 1210  ax-11o 1218
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-or 224  df-an 225  df-ex 981  df-sb 1172
Copyright terms: Public domain