| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Inference eliminating two antecedents. (The proof was shortened by Josh Purinton, 29-Dec-2000.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61ii.1 |
|
| pm2.61ii.2 |
|
| pm2.61ii.3 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61ii |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm2.61ii.2 |
. 2
| |
| 2 | pm2.61ii.1 |
. . 3
| |
| 3 | pm2.61ii.3 |
. . 3
| |
| 4 | 2, 3 | pm2.61d2 129 |
. 2
|
| 5 | 1, 4 | pm2.61i 126 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: pm2.61iii 132 ecase3 752 hbae 1145 hbequid 1169 ax17eq 1211 sbequi 1228 sbcom 1258 sbcom2 1334 ax17el 1361 pssnn 4534 axextnd 4943 axunnd 4948 axpowndlem3 4951 axpownd 4953 axregndlem2 4955 axregnd 4956 axinfndlem1 4957 axinfnd 4958 alephadd 7582 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |