| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Deduction disjoining the antecedents of two implications. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| jaodan.1 |
|
| jaodan.2 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| jaodan |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | jaodan.1 |
. . . 4
| |
| 2 | 1 | ex 373 |
. . 3
|
| 3 | jaodan.2 |
. . . 4
| |
| 4 | 3 | ex 373 |
. . 3
|
| 5 | 2, 4 | jaod 424 |
. 2
|
| 6 | 5 | imp 350 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: relop 3271 phplem3 4499 ssnn 4523 1re 5418 lecase 5605 recextlem2 5666 xrsupsslem 6033 xrinfmsslem 6034 xrsupss 6035 xrinfmss 6036 flhalft 6201 expcllem 6520 expge1t 6538 exple1t 6552 cvg3 6875 faclbnd4lem3 6902 faclbnd4lem4 6903 faclbnd4 6904 fsumcmpndx2 6995 elcncf 7217 reeff1o 7385 ssblex 7818 lmsslem 7914 bcthlem16 7976 bcthlem20 7980 hmopidmchlem 10034 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-or 224 df-an 225 |