HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem hbsbcgd 1981
Description: Deduction version of hbsbcg 1948.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
hbsbcgd.1 |- (ph -> A.xph)
hbsbcgd.2 |- (ph -> A.yph)
hbsbcgd.3 |- (ph -> (z e. A -> A.x z e. A))
hbsbcgd.4 |- (ph -> (ps -> A.xps))
Assertion
Ref Expression
hbsbcgd |- ((ph /\ A e. C) -> ([A / y]ps -> A.x[A / y]ps))
Distinct variable groups:   z,A   ph,z   x,z

Proof of Theorem hbsbcgd
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-4 972 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (A.x z e. A -> z e. A)
2 hbsbcgd.3 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (ph -> (z e. A -> A.x z e. A))
31, 2impbid2 517 . . . . . . . 8 |- (ph -> (A.x z e. A <-> z e. A))
43abbidv 1575 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> {z | A.x z e. A} = {z | z e. A})
5 eleq1 1532 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (z = w -> (z e. A <-> w e. A))
65albidv 1277 . . . . . . . 8 |- (z = w -> (A.x z e. A <-> A.x w e. A))
76cbvabv 1906 . . . . . . 7 |- {z | A.x z e. A} = {w | A.x w e. A}
8 abid2 1578 . . . . . . 7 |- {z | z e. A} = A
94, 7, 83eqtr3g 1528 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> {w | A.x w e. A} = A)
109eleq1d 1538 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> ({w | A.x w e. A} e. V <-> A e. V))
1110biimpar 417 . . . 4 |- ((ph /\ A e. V) -> {w | A.x w e. A} e. V)
12 hba1 1002 . . . . . 6 |- (A.x w e. A -> A.xA.x w e. A)
1312hbab 1466 . . . . 5 |- (z e. {w | A.x w e. A} -> A.x z e. {w | A.x w e. A})
14 hba1 1002 . . . . 5 |- (A.xps -> A.xA.xps)
1513, 14hbsbcg 1948 . . . 4 |- ({w | A.x w e. A} e. V -> ([{w | A.x w e. A} / y]A.xps -> A.x[{w | A.x w e. A} / y]A.xps))
1611, 15syl 10 . . 3 |- ((ph /\ A e. V) -> ([{w | A.x w e. A} / y]A.xps -> A.x[{w | A.x w e. A} / y]A.xps))
17219.21aiv 1285 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> A.z(z e. A -> A.x z e. A))
18 abidhb 1909 . . . . . 6 |- (A.z(z e. A -> A.x z e. A) -> {w | A.x w e. A} = A)
19 dfsbcq 1940 . . . . . 6 |- ({w | A.x w e. A} = A -> ([{w | A.x w e. A} / y]A.xps <-> [A / y]A.xps))
2017, 18, 193syl 20 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> ([{w | A.x w e. A} / y]A.xps <-> [A / y]A.xps))
2120adantr 389 . . . 4 |- ((ph /\ A e. V) -> ([{w | A.x w e. A} / y]A.xps <-> [A / y]A.xps))
22 hbsbcgd.2 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> A.yph)
23 ax-4 972 . . . . . 6 |- (A.xps -> ps)
24 hbsbcgd.4 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (ps -> A.xps))
2523, 24impbid2 517 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> (A.xps <-> ps))
2622, 25sbcbid 1973 . . . 4 |- ((ph /\ A e. V) -> ([A / y]A.xps <-> [A / y]ps))
2721, 26bitrd 527 . . 3 |- ((ph /\ A e. V) -> ([{w | A.x w e. A} / y]A.xps <-> [A / y]ps))
28 hbsbcgd.1 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> A.xph)
2928a1d 12 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (ph -> A.xph))
30 ax-17 970 . . . . . . . 8 |- (z e. V -> A.x z e. V)
3130a1i 8 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (z e. V -> A.x z e. V))
3228, 2, 31hbeld 1911 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (A e. V -> A.x A e. V))
3329, 32hband 1110 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> ((ph /\ A e. V) -> A.x(ph /\ A e. V)))
3433anabsi5 495 . . . 4 |- ((ph /\ A e. V) -> A.x(ph /\ A e. V))
3534, 27albid 1103 . . 3 |- ((ph /\ A e. V) -> (A.x[{w | A.x w e. A} / y]A.xps <-> A.x[A / y]ps))
3616, 27, 353imtr3d 541 . 2 |- ((ph /\ A e. V) -> ([A / y]ps -> A.x[A / y]ps))
37 elisset 1814 . 2 |- (A e. C -> A e. V)
3836, 37sylan2 451 1 |- ((ph /\ A e. C) -> ([A / y]ps -> A.x[A / y]ps))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146   /\ wa 223  A.wal 953   = wceq 955   e. wcel 957  [wsbc 1169  {cab 1462  Vcvv 1808
This theorem is referenced by:  hbcsbgd 2025
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 961  ax-gen 962  ax-8 963  ax-10 965  ax-12 967  ax-17 970  ax-4 972  ax-5o 974  ax-6o 977  ax-9o 1122  ax-10o 1139  ax-16 1209  ax-11o 1217  ax-ext 1458
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 980  df-sb 1171  df-clab 1463  df-cleq 1468  df-clel 1471  df-v 1809  df-sbc 1939
Copyright terms: Public domain