HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem hbopd 2497
Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder hbop 2496.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
hbopd.1 |- (ph -> A.xph)
hbopd.2 |- (ph -> (y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
hbopd.3 |- (ph -> (y e. B -> A.x y e. B))
Assertion
Ref Expression
hbopd |- (ph -> (y e. <.A, B>. -> A.x y e. <.A, B>.))
Distinct variable groups:   y,B   y,A   ph,y   x,y

Proof of Theorem hbopd
StepHypRef Expression
1 hba1 1003 . . . . 5 |- (A.x z e. A -> A.xA.x z e. A)
21hbab 1467 . . . 4 |- (y e. {z | A.x z e. A} -> A.x y e. {z | A.x z e. A})
3 hba1 1003 . . . . 5 |- (A.x z e. B -> A.xA.x z e. B)
43hbab 1467 . . . 4 |- (y e. {z | A.x z e. B} -> A.x y e. {z | A.x z e. B})
52, 4hbop 2496 . . 3 |- (y e. <.{z | A.x z e. A}, {z | A.x z e. B}>. -> A.x y e. <.{z | A.x z e. A}, {z | A.x z e. B}>.)
65a1i 8 . 2 |- (ph -> (y e. <.{z | A.x z e. A}, {z | A.x z e. B}>. -> A.x y e. <.{z | A.x z e. A}, {z | A.x z e. B}>.))
7 hbopd.2 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
8719.21aiv 1286 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> A.y(y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
9 abidhb 1912 . . . . . 6 |- (A.y(y e. A -> A.x y e. A) -> {z | A.x z e. A} = A)
108, 9syl 10 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> {z | A.x z e. A} = A)
1110opeq1d 2493 . . . 4 |- (ph -> <.{z | A.x z e. A}, {z | A.x z e. B}>. = <.A, {z | A.x z e. B}>.)
12 hbopd.3 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (y e. B -> A.x y e. B))
131219.21aiv 1286 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> A.y(y e. B -> A.x y e. B))
14 abidhb 1912 . . . . . 6 |- (A.y(y e. B -> A.x y e. B) -> {z | A.x z e. B} = B)
1513, 14syl 10 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> {z | A.x z e. B} = B)
1615opeq2d 2494 . . . 4 |- (ph -> <.A, {z | A.x z e. B}>. = <.A, B>.)
1711, 16eqtrd 1507 . . 3 |- (ph -> <.{z | A.x z e. A}, {z | A.x z e. B}>. = <.A, B>.)
1817eleq2d 1541 . 2 |- (ph -> (y e. <.{z | A.x z e. A}, {z | A.x z e. B}>. <-> y e. <.A, B>.))
19 hbopd.1 . . 3 |- (ph -> A.xph)
2019, 18albid 1104 . 2 |- (ph -> (A.x y e. <.{z | A.x z e. A}, {z | A.x z e. B}>. <-> A.x y e. <.A, B>.))
216, 18, 203imtr3d 542 1 |- (ph -> (y e. <.A, B>. -> A.x y e. <.A, B>.))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3  A.wal 954   = wceq 956   e. wcel 958  {cab 1463  <.cop 2411
This theorem is referenced by:  dfid3 2836
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 962  ax-gen 963  ax-8 964  ax-10 966  ax-12 968  ax-17 971  ax-4 973  ax-5o 975  ax-6o 978  ax-9o 1123  ax-10o 1140  ax-16 1210  ax-11o 1218  ax-ext 1459
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-or 224  df-an 225  df-ex 981  df-sb 1172  df-clab 1464  df-cleq 1469  df-clel 1472  df-v 1812  df-un 2050  df-sn 2412  df-pr 2413  df-op 2416
Copyright terms: Public domain