HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem elrab3 1906
Description: Membership in a restricted class abstraction with implicit substitution.
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
elrab.1 |- (x = A -> (ph <-> ps))
Assertion
Ref Expression
elrab3 |- (A e. B -> (A e. {x e. B | ph} <-> ps))
Distinct variable groups:   ps,x   x,A   x,B

Proof of Theorem elrab3
StepHypRef Expression
1 elrab.1 . . 3 |- (x = A -> (ph <-> ps))
21elrab 1905 . 2 |- (A e. {x e. B | ph} <-> (A e. B /\ ps))
32baib 685 1 |- (A e. B -> (A e. {x e. B | ph} <-> ps))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146   = wceq 956   e. wcel 958  {crab 1648
This theorem is referenced by:  unimax 2532
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 962  ax-gen 963  ax-8 964  ax-10 966  ax-12 968  ax-17 971  ax-4 973  ax-5o 975  ax-6o 978  ax-9o 1123  ax-10o 1140  ax-16 1210  ax-11o 1218  ax-ext 1459
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 981  df-sb 1172  df-clab 1464  df-cleq 1469  df-clel 1472  df-rab 1652  df-v 1812
Copyright terms: Public domain