HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem elintab 2548
Description: Membership in the intersection of a class abstraction.
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
inteqab.1 |- A e. V
Assertion
Ref Expression
elintab |- (A e. |^|{x | ph} <-> A.x(ph -> A e. x))
Distinct variable group:   x,A

Proof of Theorem elintab
StepHypRef Expression
1 inteqab.1 . . 3 |- A e. V
21elint 2543 . 2 |- (A e. |^|{x | ph} <-> A.y(y e. {x | ph} -> A e. y))
3 hbab1 1469 . . . 4 |- (y e. {x | ph} -> A.x y e. {x | ph})
4 ax-17 973 . . . 4 |- (A e. y -> A.x A e. y)
53, 4hbim 1009 . . 3 |- ((y e. {x | ph} -> A e. y) -> A.x(y e. {x | ph} -> A e. y))
6 ax-17 973 . . 3 |- ((ph -> A e. x) -> A.y(ph -> A e. x))
7 eleq1 1537 . . . . 5 |- (y = x -> (y e. {x | ph} <-> x e. {x | ph}))
8 abid 1468 . . . . 5 |- (x e. {x | ph} <-> ph)
97, 8syl6bb 538 . . . 4 |- (y = x -> (y e. {x | ph} <-> ph))
10 eleq2 1538 . . . 4 |- (y = x -> (A e. y <-> A e. x))
119, 10imbi12d 628 . . 3 |- (y = x -> ((y e. {x | ph} -> A e. y) <-> (ph -> A e. x)))
125, 6, 11cbval 1167 . 2 |- (A.y(y e. {x | ph} -> A e. y) <-> A.x(ph -> A e. x))
132, 12bitr 173 1 |- (A e. |^|{x | ph} <-> A.x(ph -> A e. x))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146  A.wal 956   = wceq 958   e. wcel 960  {cab 1466  Vcvv 1814  |^|cint 2537
This theorem is referenced by:  elintrab 2549  intmin4 2563  intab 2564  dfom3 4639  1nn 5936  peano2nn 5937  dfuz 6204
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 964  ax-gen 965  ax-8 966  ax-10 968  ax-12 970  ax-17 973  ax-4 975  ax-5o 977  ax-6o 980  ax-9o 1125  ax-10o 1142  ax-16 1212  ax-11o 1220  ax-ext 1462
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 983  df-sb 1174  df-clab 1467  df-cleq 1472  df-clel 1475  df-v 1815  df-int 2538
Copyright terms: Public domain