HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem difab 2269
Description: Difference of two class abstractions.
Assertion
Ref Expression
difab |- ({x | ph} \ {x | ps}) = {x | (ph /\ -. ps)}

Proof of Theorem difab
StepHypRef Expression
1 sbn 1231 . . . . . 6 |- ([y / x] -. ps <-> -. [y / x]ps)
2 df-clab 1464 . . . . . 6 |- (y e. {x | -. ps} <-> [y / x] -. ps)
3 df-clab 1464 . . . . . . 7 |- (y e. {x | ps} <-> [y / x]ps)
43negbii 187 . . . . . 6 |- (-. y e. {x | ps} <-> -. [y / x]ps)
51, 2, 43bitr4 183 . . . . 5 |- (y e. {x | -. ps} <-> -. y e. {x | ps})
6 visset 1813 . . . . . 6 |- y e. V
76biantrur 725 . . . . 5 |- (-. y e. {x | ps} <-> (y e. V /\ -. y e. {x | ps}))
85, 7bitr2 174 . . . 4 |- ((y e. V /\ -. y e. {x | ps}) <-> y e. {x | -. ps})
98difeqri 2160 . . 3 |- (V \ {x | ps}) = {x | -. ps}
109ineq2i 2214 . 2 |- ({x | ph} i^i (V \ {x | ps})) = ({x | ph} i^i {x | -. ps})
11 invdif 2249 . 2 |- ({x | ph} i^i (V \ {x | ps})) = ({x | ph} \ {x | ps})
12 inab 2268 . 2 |- ({x | ph} i^i {x | -. ps}) = {x | (ph /\ -. ps)}
1310, 11, 123eqtr3 1503 1 |- ({x | ph} \ {x | ps}) = {x | (ph /\ -. ps)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   /\ wa 223   = wceq 956   e. wcel 958  [wsbc 1170  {cab 1463  Vcvv 1811   \ cdif 2044   i^i cin 2046
This theorem is referenced by:  difrab 2273
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 962  ax-gen 963  ax-8 964  ax-10 966  ax-12 968  ax-17 971  ax-4 973  ax-5o 975  ax-6o 978  ax-9o 1123  ax-10o 1140  ax-16 1210  ax-11o 1218  ax-ext 1459
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 981  df-sb 1172  df-clab 1464  df-cleq 1469  df-clel 1472  df-v 1812  df-dif 2049  df-in 2051
Copyright terms: Public domain