| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: A contraposition deduction. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con2bid.1 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con2bid |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | con2bid.1 |
. 2
| |
| 2 | con2bi 527 |
. 2
| |
| 3 | 1, 2 | sylibr 200 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: con1bid 529 necon2abid 1625 necon2bbid 1626 r19.9rzv 2353 sotric 2866 sotrieq 2867 so 2870 ordtri2 2988 ord0eln0 3029 ordunisuc2 3121 limsssuc 3127 nlimon 3128 oawordeulem 4194 onomeneq 4525 rankr1 4684 ondomcard 4868 prlem934b 5150 suplem2pr 5174 sqgt0sr 5227 suppsr2 5235 suppsr3 5236 xrltnlet 5514 ltnlet 5523 leloet 5530 xrlttrit 5564 xrleloet 5569 xrrebndt 5580 supxrbnd 6093 supxrbnd2 6098 elnnz1 6157 om2uzf1o 6302 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 |