HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem a12stdy3 1374
Description: Part of a study related to ax-12 968. The consequent introduces two new variables. There are no distinct variable restrictions.
Assertion
Ref Expression
a12stdy3 |- (A.z(z = x /\ x = y) -> A.vE.y x = w)

Proof of Theorem a12stdy3
StepHypRef Expression
1 a12stdy2 1373 . 2 |- (A.z(z = x /\ x = y) -> A.y y = x)
2 hbae 1145 . 2 |- (A.y y = x -> A.vA.y y = x)
3 a12stdy1 1372 . . 3 |- (A.y y = x -> E.y x = w)
4319.20i 992 . 2 |- (A.vA.y y = x -> A.vE.y x = w)
51, 2, 43syl 20 1 |- (A.z(z = x /\ x = y) -> A.vE.y x = w)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   /\ wa 223  A.wal 954   = wceq 956  E.wex 980
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 962  ax-gen 963  ax-9 965  ax-10 966  ax-12 968  ax-4 973  ax-5o 975  ax-10o 1140
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 981
Copyright terms: Public domain